delete_note_by_id
Delete a specific note by providing its unique ID. This action permanently removes the note from your collection.
Instructions
Delete a note using its ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| note_id | Yes |
Delete a specific note by providing its unique ID. This action permanently removes the note from your collection.
Delete a note using its ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| note_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description fails to disclose important behavioral traits such as whether deletion is permanent, if it cascades, or requires specific permissions. The minimal description leaves the agent uninformed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely short (6 words), which is concise but at the cost of essential details. Not front-loaded with key info because there is barely any content. Could be expanded slightly without harming conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given a simple tool with one parameter but no annotations, output schema, or sibling differentiation, the description is too sparse. Missing usage context, behavioral impacts, and parameter clarification make it incomplete for reliable agent invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, meaning no parameter descriptions. The description only repeats the parameter name (note_id) without explaining format, source, or constraints. Fails to compensate for missing schema details.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action (delete), resource (note), and method (by ID). Distinguishes from sibling tools like delete_notes_by_title which deletes multiple by title.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like delete_notes_by_title or update_note. Does not specify prerequisites or constraints.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/chaitanya-jadhav11/notes-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server