create_project

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description is a simple verb+noun with no additional behavioral details such as side effects, permissions, idempotency, or uniqueness constraints. The tool is a creation operation, but the description offers no extra transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no redundancy. It is concise, though it could be more informative without losing brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and 3 parameters, the description fails to explain what 'project tag' means, success/error results, or constraints. It is minimal and leaves significant gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% already providing descriptions for all three parameters. The description adds no further meaning beyond what is in the schema, so baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states 'Create a new project tag' which clearly indicates the action and resource. However, 'project tag' is slightly ambiguous as sibling tools suggest 'project' is the main entity. Still specific enough for an AI agent to understand.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'add_project_from_template' or 'list_projects'. The AI agent is left to infer context from sibling names.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.