ruddur_record_creator_event

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

It adds useful behavioral specifics beyond the annotations: the scope requirement and the fact that the server accepts aliases for parameter names. This helps the agent understand access control and flexible input expectations. It does not contradict the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise—two sentences, no filler. It front-loads the primary purpose and efficiently provides alias and scope details. Every sentence contributes to understanding the tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the description is adequate, it leaves gaps: the body schema's mention of 'waypoint payloads' and 'assessmentConfig' is irrelevant for a creator analytics event, and the description does not enumerate other valid event fields or the success response. With no output schema, the agent lacks a complete picture of what to send and what to expect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides descriptions and 100% coverage for top-level parameters, establishing a baseline of 3. The description adds meaning by documenting aliases for eventType and occurredAt, which are not present in the schema. This extra semantic information helps the agent construct valid payloads.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the specific verb 'Record' and resource 'creator analytics event', making the tool's purpose immediately clear. It also implicitly distinguishes itself from the sibling tool ruddur_get_creator_analytics, which is about retrieving analytics rather than recording events.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description clearly implies when to use the tool (to record a creator analytics event) and notes an important prerequisite: requires scope events.write. However, it does not explicitly mention when not to use it or reference alternative tools, so it falls short of a full 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.