Progresso MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Progresso MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Supabase database and storage operations, enabling querying, inserting, updating, deleting rows, schema introspection, and file storage management.122 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables turning an existing Supabase database and Edge Functions into an MCP server, exposing selected tables with Row Level Security and Edge Functions as tools for use in MCP clients.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceExposes your application's resources and tools as an MCP server using Supabase Auth, Postgres, and Row Level Security, allowing authorized users to connect via compatible MCP clients.255 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables CRUD management of tasks, workspaces, and notes via a remote MCP server with Supabase authentication and synchronization across Linux, Android, and ChatGPT.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables secure interaction with Supabase databases via the PostgREST API, supporting full CRUD operations and stored procedure calls. It utilizes the Dedalus MCP framework to provide encrypted credential handling and just-in-time token exchange.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Supabase, enabling database CRUD, storage management, auth administration, project management, edge functions, and secrets via 31 tools.10 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: ticket lifecycle (create/update/move/get/list), leads (list/create/update), project management (list/update), and time tracking (check_in/check_out/stop_timer). The main overlap is move_ticket vs update_ticket since moving is essentially updating status, though the descriptions clarify move is column-specific while update is general field patching. dashboard_pulse is distinct enough as an aggregate view.
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_tickets, create_ticket, update_ticket, move_ticket, list_leads, create_lead, update_lead, list_projects, update_project). Minor deviations exist like check_in/check_out/stop_timer and dashboard_pulse which don't follow the resource-noun pattern, but they're still understandable and follow predictable verb-first phrasing.
15 tools for an agency management/progress tracking server is well-scoped. Each tool covers a distinct functional area: tickets, leads, projects, time tracking, and dashboard aggregate. The count feels complete without being bloated, and each tool appears necessary for the stated purpose.
Ticket management is thorough (list, get, create, update, move, comment), and leads/projects have basic CRUD. However, there are notable gaps: no way to delete tickets, leads, or projects; no tool to list tickets for a specific ticket's sub-tickets (only get_ticket for one); CRM has no way to view individual lead details separately from the list; and there's no tool to list or view project details beyond the list. The time-tracking tools depend on tickets but their interaction with the ticket surface feels slightly disconnected.