get_balance
Check your Tuning Engines account balance and view recent transactions.
Instructions
Check your Tuning Engines account balance and recent transactions.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Check your Tuning Engines account balance and view recent transactions.
Check your Tuning Engines account balance and recent transactions.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description carries the full burden. It indicates a read operation ('Check') but does not disclose behavioral traits such as authentication needs, rate limits, or what 'recent' means. Basic safety is implied but not detailed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence with no unnecessary words. Extremely concise and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description covers the basic purpose. However, it lacks specifics about the output format, transaction count, or time range for 'recent'. Somewhat incomplete for a well-rounded understanding.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter info, which is acceptable since there are none. Baseline 4 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool checks 'account balance and recent transactions', which is a specific verb+resource. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool 'get_account', which might also provide account details.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives like 'get_account'. The description implies it's for checking balance and transactions, but does not explicitly state context or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/cerebrixos-org/tuning-engines-cli'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server