Skip to main content
Glama
cenogram

cenogram-mcp-server

Official
by cenogram

get_parcel_report

Read-only

Get a single report combining parcel core, nine enrichment layers, transaction history, price context, and municipal context. One call replaces multiple per-layer tools.

Instructions

The whole dossier for one land parcel in a single call: the parcel core (location, area, land use, plan designation), all nine enrichment layers (flood risk, heritage listing, landslide risk, nuisance surroundings, public-transport access, general-plan zoning, buildings on the parcel, recent building activity, agricultural-land eligibility), the parcel's transaction history (newest first, up to 20), a local price context (median zł/m² for the county and the locality over the last 12 months) and a municipal context (a headline demographic/economic subset plus upcoming-infrastructure signals for the gmina). Address it by a full cadastral id in the natural '/' form ('142907_2.0014.342/5'), the URL-safe '-' form, or the internal UUID from a search or resolve result. Each section carries its own state, shown explicitly: covered = a definitive result; covered_no_data = the parcel was checked and nothing was found (still billed); not_covered = outside our data (refunded); not_computed = a live computation could not finish in time (refunded — the rest of the report still returns, so a report can be partial). The two context sections instead use full / low_sample / suppressed / no_data. Prefer this over calling the per-layer parcel tools one by one — it is one call at a flat price and never costs more than the sum of its parts. Use resolve_parcel first when you only have an address, a coordinate, or a 'locality + number'. Costs 35 API tokens. Billing is by outcome (see the billing line on the response): a parcel that cannot be resolved is fully refunded; a resolved parcel where no layer had data is billed only the core floor (1 token) with the rest refunded; a resolved parcel with at least one covered layer is billed in full.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
parcelIdYesFull cadastral id ('142907_2.0014.342/5' or the '-' form) or the internal UUID from a search/resolve result.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so safety is clear. The description adds extensive behavioral detail: cost of 35 tokens, billing model based on outcome (full refund, partial refund, full charge), explanation of section states (covered, covered_no_data, not_covered, not_computed), and input format variations. This goes well beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is comprehensive yet efficient. It front-loads the main purpose, then systematically explains input format, output states, usage recommendations, and billing. Every sentence adds value, and the length is appropriate for the tool's complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (many layers, sections, sibling tools), the description is remarkably complete. It covers input, output structure (section states), billing, and when to use alternative tools (resolve_parcel). No obvious gaps remain for an agent to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% coverage for the single parameter 'parcelId', but the description adds value by explaining the acceptable input forms (natural '/', URL-safe '-', internal UUID) and their origin from search/resolve results. This extra context justifies a 4 over the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves a comprehensive dossier for one land parcel, listing all included data (core, nine enrichment layers, transaction history, price context, municipal context). It distinguishes from sibling tools like per-layer parcel tools by explicitly recommending this tool over calling them individually.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit when-to-use guidance: 'Prefer this over calling the per-layer parcel tools one by one' and instructions to 'Use resolve_parcel first when you only have an address, a coordinate, or a locality + number'. This directly addresses usage context and alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/cenogram/mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server