Şarkı çal

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide a safety profile (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, openWorldHint=true). The description adds valuable behavioral context beyond annotations: it interrupts the current song and falls back to the last used channel if channel is omitted. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences, front-loaded with the action and its main side effect, then input modes, then channel default. No filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and annotations covering safety, the description supplies key runtime behavior: interruption, input modes, and channel default. It omits discussion of the guild parameter, but the schema fully documents it, so the definition is nearly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds behavioral meaning for the song parameter (search text causes the first YouTube result to play) and for the channel parameter (defaults to last used channel if omitted). It does not further explain guild, but the schema already documents that parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: starts playing a song in a Discord voice channel, and notes that it interrupts the currently playing song. The purpose is clear, but it does not explicitly differentiate itself from sibling tools like search_songs or now_playing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides useful input-mode guidance (URL vs search text, first YouTube result fallback, default channel when omitted), but gives no explicit when-to-use-this-vs-alternatives guidance or exclusions relative to siblings such as search_songs or stop_music.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.