Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Celo MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools map cleanly to a distinct resource or action (blocks, transactions, governance, staking, faucet), and list-vs-detail pairs like get_validator_groups/get_validator_group_details are clear. However, the balance trio — get_token_balance, get_celo_balances, and get_stable_token_balance — heavily overlaps, since the latter two both return CELO plus major stablecoin balances via different mechanisms, forcing an agent to guess which to call.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 17 tools follow a predictable snake_case verb_noun pattern, overwhelmingly get_<resource> with two sensible action verbs (request_faucet_funds, get_faucet_request_status). No mixed conventions or vague standalone verbs.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 17 tools the surface is on the heavier side, but the domain is broad (blocks, transactions, balances, governance, staking, faucet) and each sub-area genuinely needs multiple tools. A few tools, notably the redundant balance variants, could be consolidated.

    Completeness3/5

    Read coverage is solid for blocks, transactions, governance proposals, validator groups, and staking balances, and the faucet pair forms a complete request/status loop. But the surface is entirely read-only: there is no governance voting, no stake/activate/unstake actions despite get_activatable_stakes, no generic contract read/call, and no event log or address-search tool, leaving dead ends for write-oriented workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive