Zentao Bug MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Zentao Bug MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseDqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables reading and managing Zentao tasks, bugs, requirements, test cases, and test suites via the ZenTao 11.3 Legacy Session API. It integrates with MCP clients like Codex, Claude Desktop, and Cursor.484 npmMIT
- FlicenseDqualityBmaintenanceAI-powered MCP server for analyzing UI designs and bug reports from Lanhu and Zentao platforms.2-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that integrates with Zentao's RESTful API to manage bugs, including listing, resolving, closing, and commenting, with support for product and project set contexts.1135 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that integrates with Zentao API to provide tools for accessing tasks, bugs, and attachments from project management.2,469 npm-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides an MCP server for ZenTao (禅道) project management. It enables read-only queries for projects, tasks, bugs, users, and stories, and supports write operations like task assignment, progression, and bug resolution when explicitly confirmed.38 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Python MCP server that retrieves requirements and bug data from TAPD platform to provide AI clients with project management information.212MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool has a unique action and target: activate, close, get, health check, list (general), list (my), resolve. No two tools overlap in purpose; an agent can clearly distinguish them.
All tools use a consistent 'zentao_verb_noun' snake_case pattern (e.g., zentao_activate_bug, zentao_list_bugs). Even zentao_health_check follows the pattern, and zentao_list_my_bugs is a natural variation. No mixing of styles.
With 7 tools covering core bug operations and a health check, the number is well-scoped for a bug management MCP server. It is neither too sparse nor too bloated.
The set covers the main bug lifecycle states (activate, resolve, close) plus listing and retrieval. However, it lacks create and update operations, which are typical for a bug tracker. This is a minor gap that agents can work around if bugs are created via other means.