Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Cortex

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables persistent long-term memory for Claude Code across sessions, with tools for storing, searching, and managing facts, knowledge graphs, and procedural lessons.
      35
      82 PyPI
      5
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code that enables long-term recall across sessions via hybrid search, code intelligence, and tools for reading/writing memory.
      25 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Cognitive memory system for AI agents with 129 MCP tools. Persistent 6-tier hierarchical memory (working→short-term→long-term→semantic), Ebbinghaus forgetting curves, dream consolidation, hybrid retrieval (BM25+RRF), goal tracking, emotional recall, knowledge graphs, and a 26-job consciousness daemon. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP client.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides long-term memory and lossless context management for Claude Code, enabling automatic context compression, cross-session memory sharing, and semantic search across all history.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Persistent memory for Claude Code — hybrid search, knowledge graph, session lifecycle.
      17
      30 PyPI
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 40 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tools cover distinct functional areas (memory management, wiki operations, methodology analysis, etc.), but there is some overlap that could cause confusion. For example, 'recall' and 'recall_hierarchical' both retrieve memories with different algorithms, and 'backfill_memories' and 'import_sessions' both import conversation history, which might lead to misselection by an agent without careful reading of descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun or verb_adjective_noun pattern (e.g., 'add_rule', 'anchor', 'assess_coverage'), with clear and descriptive names. However, there are minor deviations like 'wiki_adr' (which mixes a prefix with an acronym) and 'run_pipeline' (which is less structured), slightly reducing consistency.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 40 tools, the count is excessive for a single server, making it heavy and potentially overwhelming for agents to navigate. While the domain (cognitive memory and project management) is broad, the toolset feels bloated with many specialized operations that could have been grouped or streamlined, indicating poor scoping.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for memory storage, retrieval, maintenance, wiki management, and project analysis, with clear CRUD and lifecycle operations (e.g., 'remember', 'recall', 'forget', 'validate_memory'). There are no obvious gaps; it supports end-to-end workflows from data ingestion to visualization and narrative generation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive