Futuristic Risk Intelligence
# Futuristic Risk Intelligence — MCP Server & Data Feed
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.cct15/war-dashboard-data -->
Geopolitical conflict risk data for AI agents via [Model Context Protocol (MCP)](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/). Updated daily.
[](https://pypi.org/project/war-dashboard-data/)
[](https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/cct15/war-dashboard-data)
## MCP Tools
| Tool | Description |
|------|-------------|
| `get_conflict_risks` | Risk probabilities for 6 major geopolitical conflicts (escalation, ceasefire, regime change) with 1d/7d/30d horizons |
| `get_political_events` | High-impact political, economic, and natural disaster events with probability estimates |
| `get_maritime_traffic` | ⚠️ **Suspended** — AIS snapshot data does not meet reliability standards. Returns `status: unavailable`. |
## Install
```bash
pip install war-dashboard-data
```
## Quick Start
### Claude Desktop
Add to your `claude_desktop_config.json`:
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"futuristic-risk": {
"command": "war-dashboard-data"
}
}
}
```
Then ask Claude: *"What's the current escalation risk for Russia-Ukraine?"*
### Direct API (REST)
```bash
curl https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cct15/war-dashboard-data/main/conflicts.json
```
## Coverage
**6 conflict regions**: Russia-Ukraine, Iran-Israel/US, Israel-Palestine, China-Taiwan, India-Pakistan, US-Latin America
**5 event types** with clear risk direction:
| Event Type | Meaning | Direction |
|-----------|---------|-----------|
| `escalation` | Military escalation (strikes, invasion, nuclear test) | risk_increase |
| `ceasefire` | Ceasefire or peace agreement reached | risk_decrease |
| `ceasefire_cancel` | Existing ceasefire breaks down | risk_increase |
| `regime_change` | Government falls or changes | risk_increase |
| `diplomatic` | Major diplomatic event (nuclear deal, treaty) | neutral |
## Data Schema
### conflicts.json
Each conflict includes:
| Field | Description |
|-------|-------------|
| `conflict_id` | Region identifier (e.g. `russia_ukraine`, `iran_israel_us`) |
| `importance` | Editorial priority: `high` (active/major conflict, recommended for display) or `low` (low probability, included for data completeness) |
| `risk_level` | Overall risk: `high` / `medium` / `low` |
| `probability_30d / 7d / 1d` | P(event occurs within time horizon) |
| `situation_briefing` | Daily situation summary in Chinese, based on latest news |
| `risk_impact` | Structured impact analysis: `industries[]`, `assets[]`, `channels[]` (transmission paths) |
| `risk_events[]` | Breakdown by event type with per-type probabilities |
| `risk_events[].direction` | `risk_increase` (higher prob = more danger) or `risk_decrease` (higher prob = less danger) |
| `risk_events[].change_vs_7d_ago` | Probability delta vs. 7 days ago |
| `data_points` | Number of data sources (for confidence assessment) |
| `anomaly_detected` | Whether probability diverges from news intensity |
### political_events.json
Political, economic, and natural disaster events with probability estimates.
| Field | Description |
|-------|-------------|
| `event_summary` | Event description (Chinese) |
| `event_summary_en` | Event description (English) |
| `category` | `political` / `economic` / `natural_disaster` |
| `probability` | Estimated probability of occurrence |
| `importance` | Editorial priority: `high` (recommended for display) or `low` (data completeness) |
| `deadline` | Event deadline (YYYY-MM-DD), if applicable |
| `data_confidence` | `high` / `medium` / `low` (based on trading volume) |
### `importance` field
Both `conflicts.json` and `political_events.json` include an `importance` field:
- **`high`** — Editorially recommended. Active conflicts, high-probability events, or events with significant recent changes. Matches the daily intelligence report's display filter.
- **`low`** — Included for data completeness. Low probability, no active events, or not a current focus area. Agents may still find these useful for comprehensive monitoring.
### maritime.json
⚠️ **Suspended**: Free AIS data (45-second snapshots) produces sporadic zero-vessel readings in busy straits, which could mislead agents into inferring blockades. Returns `{"status": "unavailable", "zones": []}`. Will resume when a reliable AIS source is found.
## Use Cases
- **Trading agents**: Adjust crypto/commodity positions based on geopolitical risk changes
- **Risk management**: Monitor conflict escalation probabilities for portfolio hedging
- **DeFi protocols**: Dynamic collateral ratios based on geopolitical risk
- **Research agents**: Track probability trends across 6 conflict regions
- **News agents**: Get structured risk data instead of parsing headlines
## Technical Details
- **Zero dependencies**: MCP server uses only Python stdlib (works with Python 3.9+)
- **Data source**: Proprietary multi-source modeling
- **Update frequency**: Daily
- **Latency**: Public data has ~24h delay
## License
Data is free for non-commercial use. Contact for commercial licensing.
## Website & Research
**[futuristicrisks.com](https://futuristicrisks.com)** — Live risk dashboard, cascade impact analysis, daily verified intelligence, and API documentation.
**Research articles**:
- [2026年全球地缘政治风险全景分析](https://futuristicrisks.com/blog/geopolitical-risk-2026.html)
- [伊朗局势对油价和供应链的影响分析](https://futuristicrisks.com/blog/iran-oil-impact.html)
- [台海冲突对全球半导体供应链的风险评估](https://futuristicrisks.com/blog/taiwan-semiconductor-risk.html)
Built by [Futuristic Risk Intelligence](https://futuristicrisks.com).
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_conflict_risks focuses on geopolitical conflict probabilities, get_maritime_traffic on vessel traffic in chokepoints, and get_political_events on broader high-impact events. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool based on the query.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' prefix (get_conflict_risks, get_maritime_traffic, get_political_events). This uniformity enhances predictability and readability, allowing agents to easily understand and navigate the toolset.
With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for a server named 'Futuristic Risk Intelligence,' which implies a broader scope. While each tool is distinct, the count may be insufficient for comprehensive risk assessment, potentially limiting agent capabilities in this domain.
The toolset has significant gaps for a risk intelligence domain. It lacks tools for updating, analyzing, or managing risk data (e.g., no create, update, or delete operations), and does not cover other risk aspects like financial, cybersecurity, or environmental risks, making the surface incomplete for the stated purpose.