Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to agentcairn

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Open memory standard for AI agents. Local-first, MCP-native, lives in your Obsidian vault. Bi-temporal markdown, hybrid retrieval, reproducible benchmark.
      14
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first, file-based memory layer for AI agents — one shared Markdown vault across Claude, Codex, Gemini, Cursor and any MCP client. Provides read/write memory tools with an audit trail, per-agent trust levels, and Git sync; no cloud and no lock-in.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP-native agent memory server. Gives AI agents persistent, decay-weighted memory via 83 MCP tools — no cloud, full control. RocksDB+HNSW backend. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent.
      14
      8
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local-first knowledge backend for AI agents that connects MCP hosts to an Obsidian-compatible vault with indexed retrieval, token-budgeted memory recall, and secure ingestion.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local-first shared memory layer for MCP-aware agents like Claude, Codex, and Hermes, enabling persistent memory across chats and clients via Markdown files and SQLite FTS.
      6
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for persistent, cross-session, local-first memory for AI agents, storing memories as Markdown files with SQLite indexing for hybrid search.
      24
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    search and recall are similar but their outputs differ (index vs full text). build_context, recent, and remember are clearly distinct. No two tools appear to do the exact same thing.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming mixes single verbs (search, recall, remember), a verb_noun (build_context), and an adjective (recent). All lowercase and readable, but no consistent pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    5 tools is well-scoped for a memory vault: search, recall, context building, recent listing, and writing. Each tool earns its place without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    Core operations are covered: create (remember), search, retrieve, list, and context expansion. Missing update/delete but these may be out of scope for a memory vault.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive