release_control
Release mouse and keyboard control from an AI agent, returning input control to the user.
Instructions
Nhả quyền điều khiển chuột/bàn phím.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Release mouse and keyboard control from an AI agent, returning input control to the user.
Nhả quyền điều khiển chuột/bàn phím.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Lacks details on side effects, prerequisites (must have taken control), error states, or return values. The description only states the action without behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single short sentence with no wasted words, effectively front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Minimal description covers the basic function but lacks context on prerequisites, error handling, and return values. For a simple tool with no parameters or output schema, it is adequate but not complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. Baseline is 4 for 0 parameters. Description does not add parameter info, but none is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool releases control of mouse and keyboard, which is a specific action distinguishing it from siblings like take_control.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It is implied it should be used after take_control, but not stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/cavaldos/neko-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server