tqs-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to tqs-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server giving Claude access to Trimble Connect, with 40 tools for projects, folder trees, files, versions, members, groups, and permissions via the Core API v2.40MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that lets Claude manage an ISO 19650 / TCVN 14177 Common Data Environment on Autodesk Construction Cloud — projects, CDE folder trees, permissions, files, document status and naming compliance.45MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAI-powered MCP server that enables Claude and other LLMs to interact directly with construction documents, drawings, and specifications through advanced RAG and hybrid search capabilities.9MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that bridges Claude with AutoCAD, enabling to generate architectural floor plans, draw geometry, and export DXF files just by describing what you need in natural language.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server to control Autodesk Navisworks Manage 2025 from Claude via natural language, enabling model inspection, property search, selection sets, and clash detection.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that integrates Claude with Blender, enabling users to analyze and interact with IFC (Industry Foundation Classes) building models through natural language commands.1762MIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool targets a distinct concern: processing, building read/edit/list, DWG read, plus supporting utilities (status, introspect, reference, script). There is no meaningful overlap; even introspect and reference are complementary (live API inspection vs offline docs).
All tools share the 'tqs_' prefix, but the verb/noun order is inconsistent: some are verb-first (tqs_list_buildings, tqs_run_script), others noun-first (tqs_building_read, tqs_dwg_read), and a couple are bare nouns (tqs_status, tqs_reference). Names are still clear and readable, but a uniform pattern would be better.
With 9 tools, the server is well-scoped. It covers the core domain operations (buildings, drawings, processing) alongside essential utilities (status, docs, introspection) without unnecessary bloat.
The surface covers listing, reading, editing buildings, reading DWGs, and running processing tasks. Dedicated create/delete building tools are missing, but tqs_run_script explicitly serves as an escape hatch for creating or deleting project files, mitigating the gap. No DWG editing tool exists, but that seems outside the primary scope.