memorydetective
Related Servers
Alternatives to memorydetective
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying Swift codebases as a knowledge graph, with hybrid semantic and structural search, type hierarchy, public API inspection, and code analysis through MCP tools.21Elastic 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceLocal-first CLI and MCP server for turning Xcode Instruments artifacts into bounded, agent-sized evidence, with support for analyses like Time Profiler, Allocations, Network, and more.2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenancemacOS native profiling and debugging MCP server that wraps sample, atos, vmmap, leaks, and lldb to enable an agent to profile, symbolicate, and debug running or freshly launched processes without manual path or port handling.1-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language profiling of iOS apps using xctrace (Instruments) for performance analysis like launch time, memory leaks, CPU usage, and network requests.12-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server and CLI for iOS development — build, test, automate, and diagnose from any AI agent or terminal.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server that provides semantic-level analysis of Swift codebases to AI agents by integrating with Apple's SourceKit-LSP, enabling compiler-grade code understanding and cross-file navigation.126Academic Free v1.1
TDQS
Scored across 42 tools
Most tools are clearly distinct in purpose, but several memgraph-analysis tools (analyzeMemgraph, findCycles, classifyCycle, reachableFromCycle) overlap in theme and input, though they return different views. Descriptions are detailed enough to help an agent avoid misselection, but the boundary between some trace analyzers (e.g., analyzeAllocations vs analyzeMemoryFootprint) could still confuse.
All 42 tools follow a consistent camelCase convention with a clear verb-noun pattern (analyze*, capture*, list*, find*, etc.). The naming makes it easy to predict tool behavior from its name, and there are no mixed conventions or chaotic verb styles.
42 tools is far beyond the typical well-scoped range and even exceeds the 'heavy' threshold. The server covers many subdomains (leaks, traces, logs, code navigation, CI), but many analyzers could be consolidated into parameterized tools (e.g., a single analyzeTrace with a schema argument). The high count increases selection difficulty and cognitive load.
The tool surface covers the full investigation lifecycle: capture (captureMemgraph, recordTimeProfile, bootAndLaunchForLeakInvestigation), analysis (findCycles, analyzeHangs, analyzeAppLaunch), diffing/verification (diffMemgraphs, verifyFix, compareTracesByPattern), CI integration (detectLeaksInXCTest/UI), and even production diagnostics (analyzeMetricKitPayload). No obvious gaps for the stated purpose.