Skip to main content
Glama
carloshpdoc

memorydetective

by carloshpdoc

Related Servers

Alternatives to memorydetective

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables querying Swift codebases as a knowledge graph, with hybrid semantic and structural search, type hierarchy, public API inspection, and code analysis through MCP tools.
      21
      Elastic 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Local-first CLI and MCP server for turning Xcode Instruments artifacts into bounded, agent-sized evidence, with support for analyses like Time Profiler, Allocations, Network, and more.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      macOS native profiling and debugging MCP server that wraps sample, atos, vmmap, leaks, and lldb to enable an agent to profile, symbolicate, and debug running or freshly launched processes without manual path or port handling.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language profiling of iOS apps using xctrace (Instruments) for performance analysis like launch time, memory leaks, CPU usage, and network requests.
      12
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides semantic-level analysis of Swift codebases to AI agents by integrating with Apple's SourceKit-LSP, enabling compiler-grade code understanding and cross-file navigation.
      126
      Academic Free v1.1

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 42 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct in purpose, but several memgraph-analysis tools (analyzeMemgraph, findCycles, classifyCycle, reachableFromCycle) overlap in theme and input, though they return different views. Descriptions are detailed enough to help an agent avoid misselection, but the boundary between some trace analyzers (e.g., analyzeAllocations vs analyzeMemoryFootprint) could still confuse.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 42 tools follow a consistent camelCase convention with a clear verb-noun pattern (analyze*, capture*, list*, find*, etc.). The naming makes it easy to predict tool behavior from its name, and there are no mixed conventions or chaotic verb styles.

    Tool Count2/5

    42 tools is far beyond the typical well-scoped range and even exceeds the 'heavy' threshold. The server covers many subdomains (leaks, traces, logs, code navigation, CI), but many analyzers could be consolidated into parameterized tools (e.g., a single analyzeTrace with a schema argument). The high count increases selection difficulty and cognitive load.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full investigation lifecycle: capture (captureMemgraph, recordTimeProfile, bootAndLaunchForLeakInvestigation), analysis (findCycles, analyzeHangs, analyzeAppLaunch), diffing/verification (diffMemgraphs, verifyFix, compareTracesByPattern), CI integration (detectLeaksInXCTest/UI), and even production diagnostics (analyzeMetricKitPayload). No obvious gaps for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive