F
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceEnables AI assistants to publish blog posts directly to Dev.to via the Model Context Protocol.
1
1
-
Activity Reporting MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Activity Reporting MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language interaction with Google Calendar via the Model Context Protocol, allowing LLMs like Claude to read and manage calendar events through the Google Calendar v3 API.2-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceConnects AI agents like Claude, Cursor, and Cline to the CoderLegion developer community platform, enabling content management and workflow automation through the Model Context Protocol.2 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceIntegrates Google Calendar with AI assistants through the Model Context Protocol, allowing users to view and manage calendar events through natural language interaction.61 npm12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEmpowers AI assistants with real-world capabilities including note management, Gmail integration, Google Calendar and Tasks management, and Git repository operations through the Model Context Protocol.13MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA powerful Model Context Protocol (MCP) server implementation for seamless Google Docs API integration, enabling AI assistants to create, read, update, and manage Google Docs.6 npmMIT
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Scored across 7 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose focused on submitting different types of activities (content creation, googler interaction, mentoring, product feedback, public speaking, story, workshop). There is no overlap in functionality - each tool handles a unique activity category, making misselection unlikely.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a perfect verb_noun pattern with 'submit_' prefix followed by the activity type. The naming is completely consistent across all 7 tools, using snake_case uniformly without any deviations or mixed conventions.
Tool Count5/5
With 7 tools, this is well-scoped for an activity reporting server. Each tool represents a distinct activity category that would realistically need separate submission handling, and the count feels appropriate for the domain without being too sparse or bloated.
Completeness3/5
The server provides comprehensive submission coverage for various activity types, but there are notable gaps in the lifecycle. There are no tools for retrieving, updating, deleting, or listing submitted activities, which limits agents to only creation workflows without the ability to manage existing submissions.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues