Skip to main content
Glama
carlosahumada89

govrider-mcp-server


What is GovRider?

GovRider is for any tech company, consultancy, or individual with a technology product or service. You don't need to be a government specialist. If you build or sell technology, there are governments looking to buy it.

  • Thousands of live opportunities from 25+ official government portals and international organisations

  • Covers the US, EU, UK, Latin America, Africa, and Asia Pacific

  • Updated nightly - only live, open opportunities are returned

  • AI-enriched - every opportunity is verified, analysed, and semantically indexed

  • Describe what you sell or what you are building and get ranked matches in seconds


Related MCP server: LexSocket MCP Server

Quick Start

1. Get an API key

Sign up at govrider.ai and create an API key at govrider.ai/app/api-keys.

2. Install

Add to ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json (macOS) or %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json (Windows):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "govrider": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@govrider/mcp-server"],
      "env": {
        "GOVRIDER_API_KEY": "gr_live_your_key_here"
      }
    }
  }
}

Restart Claude Desktop after saving.

Add to .claude/settings.json in your project or ~/.claude/settings.json globally:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "govrider": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@govrider/mcp-server"],
      "env": {
        "GOVRIDER_API_KEY": "gr_live_your_key_here"
      }
    }
  }
}

Add to your workspace .vscode/mcp.json:

{
  "servers": {
    "govrider": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@govrider/mcp-server"],
      "env": {
        "GOVRIDER_API_KEY": "gr_live_your_key_here"
      }
    }
  }
}

Tools

search_opportunities (FREE)

Discovery search across all sources. No credits required.

Parameter

Type

Required

Description

query

string

Yes

Description of your technology, product, or service (min 10 chars)

region

string

No

Filter: "EU", "US Federal", "UK", "Latin America", "Asia Pacific", "Africa"

country

string

No

Filter: "France", "Colombia", "Australia", etc.

funding_type

string

No

Filter: "Tender", "Grant", "RFP", "SBIR/STTR", "Framework"

limit

number

No

Results to return, 1-10 (default 10)

Returns for each match:

  • Sector category

  • Region

  • Funding type

  • Estimated value

  • Deadline

  • Status


search_enriched (1 credit)

High precision matching via GovRider's proprietary AI architecture.

Parameter

Type

Required

Description

query

string

Yes

Detailed description of your technology, product, or service (min 20 chars). More detail = better matches.

region

string

No

Filter: "EU", "US Federal", "UK", "Latin America", "Asia Pacific", "Africa"

country

string

No

Filter: "France", "Colombia", "Australia", etc.

funding_type

string

No

Filter: "Tender", "Grant", "RFP", "SBIR/STTR", "Framework"

Returns for each match (10 results):

  • Match score (0-100)

  • GovRider's strategic fit memo assessing your tech solution or consulting offer suitability

  • GovRider's political context analysis of opportunities identified

  • Translated English title

  • Full description

  • Agency and country

  • Direct application URL

  • Document URLs

  • Keywords

  • Deadline and estimated value


check_credits

Check your GovRider credit balance and database status. No parameters required.


Configuration

Environment Variable

Required

Description

GOVRIDER_API_KEY

Yes

Your GovRider API key. Get one at govrider.ai/app/api-keys

GOVRIDER_API_BASE

No

Override API base URL (default: https://www.govrider.ai)


Examples

GovRider works by matching what you sell or build against live government opportunities. Describe your product or service, and GovRider finds where the demand is.

Tech product

"We build a cloud-based ERP platform for finance teams. Key modules include budget forecasting, procurement workflow automation, and real-time spend analytics. We integrate with SAP and any cloud provider via API."

Tech consulting

"Our firm provides cybersecurity advisory and implementation services: penetration testing, SOC setup, zero-trust architecture design, and GDPR/NIS2 compliance audits. We specialise in critical infrastructure and defence clients."


Coverage

  • Data from 25+ official government portals and international organisations

  • Regions: US, EU, UK, Latin America, Africa, Asia Pacific

  • All data is refreshed nightly

  • Only live, open opportunities are returned


Pricing

Tool

Cost

search_opportunities

Free

search_enriched

1 credit

check_credits

Free

Buy credits at govrider.ai/pricing.


Security

  • API keys are transmitted over HTTPS only

  • Keys are never stored in plaintext on GovRider's servers (SHA-256 hashed)

  • Rate limit: 60 requests per minute per API key

  • Report security issues to contact@govrider.ai


Development

# Clone
git clone https://github.com/carlosahumada89/govrider-mcp-server.git
cd govrider-mcp-server

# Install dependencies
npm install

# Build
npm run build

# Run locally
GOVRIDER_API_KEY=gr_live_... node build/index.js

License

MIT - see LICENSE.


Available Tools

4 tools
check_creditsA

Check your GovRider credit balance. Each enriched search costs 1 credit. Discovery search and opportunity details are free.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so description carries burden. Describes a read-only operation but does not disclose if authentication is needed, real-time nature, or potential side effects. Adequate but incomplete.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with the core action being 'check your credit balance'. Every sentence adds value; no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool is simple with no parameters, but lacks output description. Given no output schema, description could mention what the balance return looks like (e.g., integer, message). Somewhat incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist (100% schema coverage), so baseline is 4. Description adds no parameter info, which is appropriate as there are none.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the purpose as checking credit balance, with specific verb 'check' and resource 'credit balance'. It distinguishes from sibling tools which are search/get operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear context about when credits are used (enriched searches) and that other actions are free, implying the tool should be used to check balance before enriched searches. Lacks explicit when-not-to-use but context is strong.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get_opportunityA

Get full details for a specific opportunity from the last enriched search. Returns the strategic fit memo, political context memo, full description, application URL, agency, keywords, and status. FREE - no extra credit cost. You must run search_enriched first.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
numberYesThe result number from the enriched search (1-10)

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden. It discloses cost behavior but does not explicitly address idempotency, side effects, or error conditions. As a simple get, it is minimally adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences: purpose, returns, and prerequisite/cost. No wasted words, well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no output schema, the description lists all return fields (strategic fit memo, etc.) and states the data source (last enriched search). This provides sufficient context for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and schema already describes the number parameter. The description adds no new detail beyond the schema, earning the baseline score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get full details for a specific opportunity') and the resource ('from the last enriched search'). It lists return fields, distinguishing it from siblings like search_enriched which performs the search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states the prerequisite ('You must run search_enriched first') and cost ('FREE - no extra credit cost'). However, it doesn't compare to search_opportunities or mention when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

search_enrichedA

Full AI-powered government procurement search with Claude Sonnet intelligence. Returns a compact ranked summary of 10 matches showing title, match score, region, type, value, and deadline. Costs 1 credit. Always searches globally across all sources to find the best matches. After reviewing the summary, use get_opportunity with a result number (1-10) to see the full strategic fit memo, political context memo, description, and application URL for any match - at no extra cost.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYesDetailed description of the technology, product, or service (min 20 chars). Include any country, region, or sector context directly in the description. More detail = better matches.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It discloses credit cost (1 credit), global scope, output format (10 matches with specific fields), and AI intelligence used. It lacks details on idempotency or error handling, but for a search tool these are not critical.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is moderately sized, front-loaded with the tool's purpose, then lists output specifics, cost, scope, and follow-up instructions. Every sentence adds value and is well-structured without repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description adequately describes the output format (10 matches, fields). It also explains the next step (get_opportunity) and cost. It does not mention what happens if no matches are found, but overall is sufficiently complete for a search tool with one parameter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'query' has full schema description. The tool description adds semantic guidance: 'Include any country, region, or sector context directly in the description. More detail = better matches.' This adds value beyond the schema by advising on detail and context inclusion.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it is a government procurement search tool that returns a ranked summary of 10 matches with specific fields. It names sibling 'get_opportunity' for follow-up, but does not explicitly distinguish from sibling 'search_opportunities', so it is somewhat clear but not fully differentiated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description advises using get_opportunity after reviewing the summary, but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus the alternative 'search_opportunities', nor does it describe any prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

search_opportunitiesA

Search government procurement opportunities worldwide. Returns sector category, region, funding type, estimated value, deadline, and status for up to 10 matches. FREE - no credits required. Always searches globally across all sources. Use this for initial discovery before committing credits to enriched search.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYesDescription of the technology, product, or service to match against government opportunities (min 10 chars). Include any country, region, or sector context directly in the description.

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses result limit (10 matches), free cost, and global search. Does not explicitly state read-only behavior, but search operation implies no side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences with no wasted words. Front-loads purpose, then adds key usage guidance and differentiating details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Single parameter, no output schema, yet description covers what it returns, limits, cost, scope, and relationship to sibling tool. Complete for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a detailed description. The tool description does not add significant meaning beyond the schema; it reiterates context inclusion advice already in the schema description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Explicitly states it searches government procurement opportunities worldwide, lists returned fields, and distinguishes from sibling tool search_enriched by noting free usage and global search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Clearly advises use for initial discovery before committing credits to enriched search, implying when to switch to search_enriched. Provides context on free usage and global scope.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 3 tool updatesv1.1.3
    • Addedget_opportunity
    • Changedsearch_enriched4 fields changed
      • removedInput schema / properties / country
        Removed value: -{
        -  "description": "Filter by country (e.g. \"France\", \"Colombia\", \"Australia\")",
        -  "type": "string"
        -}
      • removedInput schema / properties / funding_type
        Removed value: -{
        -  "description": "Filter by funding type (e.g. \"Tender\", \"Grant\", \"RFP\", \"SBIR/STTR\", \"Framework\")",
        -  "type": "string"
        -}
      • changedInput schema / properties / query / description
        Previous value: -"Detailed description of the technology, product, or service (min 20 chars). More detail = better matches."New value: +"Detailed description of the technology, product, or service (min 20 chars). Include any country, region, or sector context directly in the description. More detail = better matches."
      • removedInput schema / properties / region
        Removed value: -{
        -  "description": "Filter by region (e.g. \"EU\", \"US Federal\", \"UK\", \"Latin America\", \"Asia Pacific\", \"Africa\")",
        -  "type": "string"
        -}
    • Changedsearch_opportunities5 fields changed
      • removedInput schema / properties / country
        Removed value: -{
        -  "description": "Filter by country (e.g. \"France\", \"Colombia\", \"Australia\")",
        -  "type": "string"
        -}
      • removedInput schema / properties / funding_type
        Removed value: -{
        -  "description": "Filter by funding type (e.g. \"Tender\", \"Grant\", \"RFP\", \"SBIR/STTR\", \"Framework\")",
        -  "type": "string"
        -}
      • removedInput schema / properties / limit
        Removed value: -{
        -  "description": "Number of results to return (1–10, default 10)",
        -  "maximum": 10,
        -  "minimum": 1,
        -  "type": "number"
        -}
      • changedInput schema / properties / query / description
        Previous value: -"Description of the technology, product, or service to match against government opportunities (min 10 chars)"New value: +"Description of the technology, product, or service to match against government opportunities (min 10 chars). Include any country, region, or sector context directly in the description."
      • removedInput schema / properties / region
        Removed value: -{
        -  "description": "Filter by region (e.g. \"EU\", \"US Federal\", \"UK\", \"Latin America\", \"Asia Pacific\", \"Africa\")",
        -  "type": "string"
        -}
  2. 3 tool updatesv1.1.0
    • First observedcheck_credits
    • First observedsearch_enriched
    • First observedsearch_opportunities

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct step in the procurement search workflow: credit checks, free discovery, paid enriched search, and detailed opportunity viewing. There is no overlap in purpose.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (check_credits, get_opportunity, search_enriched, search_opportunities), making them predictable and easy to understand.

Tool Count5/5

With four tools, the server covers the essential user journey without unnecessary complexity. Each tool earns its place, and the count is appropriate for the domain.

Completeness5/5

The tool set provides a complete workflow: free discovery search, enriched search, detailed opportunity retrieval, and credit management. There are no obvious gaps for the stated purpose of government procurement search.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables search and analysis of European public procurement tenders, including EU above-threshold (TED) and below-threshold from 11 national sources, with hybrid search and filtering.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    UK public procurement data for AI agents. Tenders, contracts, buyer and supplier profiles over MCP and REST. 250 free credits.
    MIT

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/carlosahumada89/govrider-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server