Skip to main content
Glama
captainsean0411-hub

lablog-mcp

by captainsean0411-hub
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to lablog-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Obsidian MCP Tools

      dp-veritas
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only toolkit for searching and analyzing Markdown note directories and Obsidian vaults through AI clients. It enables metadata extraction, full-text search, and natural language querying of note content, tags, and backlinks.
      10 npm
      4
      AGPL 3.0

    • wyrd-mcp

      MortalPastry
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to read Markdown notes from a single explicitly granted local folder, read-only, with strict containment against access outside that folder.
      1
      496 npm
      MIT

    • notes-mcp

      OL486
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides read-only access to a local Markdown notes directory for AI assistants, enabling full-text search, note reading, recent-note listing, statistics, indexed resources, and weekly-review prompts while enforcing path safety and output budgets.
      4
      MIT

    • MCP Notes Server

      revanthpp
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with a local folder of Markdown notes, supporting listing, reading, searching, creating, and appending to notes with strict security boundaries.
      5
      MIT

    • notes-gpuix

      dotNacer
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, create, update, delete, and search markdown notes stored locally.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    两个工具职责清晰：一个按目录聚合并生成时间线，另一个读取单篇笔记全文与结构化详情。二者的作用域（目录级 vs 单文件级）区分明确，仅因共享 get_experiment_ 前缀与同为只读获取操作，存在轻微的初始混淆可能。

    Naming Consistency5/5

    两个工具均采用一致的 verb_noun 模式（get_experiment_timeline / get_experiment_detail），共享 get_experiment 前缀，风格统一、可预测。

    Tool Count3/5

    仅 2 个工具，对于“实验笔记”这一域来说偏薄；不过服务定位较为聚焦（时间线浏览 + 单篇详情），勉强自洽。

    Completeness3/5

    覆盖了实验笔记的检索与查看（列表+详情），但完全缺少写入类操作，无法创建、更新或删除实验笔记，对“log（记录）”这一核心用途构成明显缺口。

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources