templates_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds behavioral context beyond annotations by disclosing the permission requirement, warning that the output contains untrusted_text, and advising inspection before sharing. This supplements the annotations (readOnlyHint=false, idempotentHint=false) without contradicting them, though it does not mention rate limits or duplicate creation behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is highly concise with three labeled sections (Purpose, Requires, Returns), each sentence earning its place. It is front-loaded, scannable, and free of redundancy, making it easy for an agent to quickly extract key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the essential context: purpose, permission, return shape, and a safety warning about untrusted text. Since an output schema exists, it does not need to detail every return field. It could mention non-idempotency or duplicate creation, but the idempotentHint=false annotation already signals this, so the description is sufficiently complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with all four parameters (name, guild_id, description, audit_reason) already explained in the input schema. The description does not add significant parameter-level meaning; it only implies the guild context through 'caller bot's current guild layout', which aligns with guild_id.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb phrase 'Snapshot the caller bot's current guild layout as a new Discord Guild Template', clearly identifying the action and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling template tools like templates_get/list/modify by emphasizing 'new' and creating a shareable snapshot.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Clear context is provided via the required MANAGE_GUILD permission and the note to inspect before sharing the use_url, which implies a safe usage workflow. However, it does not explicitly name alternative tools or state when not to use this tool, relying on the 'new' keyword to differentiate from template modification tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.