Skip to main content
Glama
camelmailer

CamelMailer MCP Server

Official
by camelmailer

Related Servers

Alternatives to CamelMailer MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables sending transactional emails through GetMailer from AI assistants. Supports email operations, template management, domain verification, analytics, suppression lists, and batch email jobs.
      14
      12 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Lets AI tools send transactional emails, check status, and manage contacts through the Model Context Protocol.
      2
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to send transactional emails through Quolle, including sending, batching, canceling, and checking delivery status of emails.
      5
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to send transactional emails and manage email infrastructure through the AgentiSend API, including domain verification, budgeted keys, and message logs.
      72 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to send transactional emails programmatically through the Lemon Email API. Provides simple email sending capabilities with customizable sender information, recipients, and content.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to send emails, manage campaigns, subscribers, templates, and domains via the SendCraft email API.
      26
      10 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 38 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource and action, and descriptions explicitly disambiguate near-overlaps like send_campaign_now vs send_campaign and send_to_stream vs create_campaign_draft. A few pairs, such as get_email vs get_inbound and list_emails vs list_bounces, could still cause misselection if an agent is not careful.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming is predominantly lowercase snake_case verb_noun, e.g. list_campaigns, create_layout, update_stream, cancel_campaign. Minor deviations like dmarc_summary, send_campaign_now, and send_email_with_template break the exact pattern but remain readable and predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 38 tools, this is well beyond the typical 3-15 tool sweet spot and above the 25-tool threshold for a heavy surface. Although the tools are organized into logical domains, the sheer number makes navigation and selection harder for an agent.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface is broad, covering transactional sends, campaigns, streams, subscribers, layouts, inbound handling, and stats, but template management is read-only: list_templates and render_template exist with no create_template/update_template/delete_template. There are also lifecycle gaps like no delete_campaign, delete_stream, or unarchive_stream.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues