stop
Halts playback and rewinds to the starting position, resetting transport during Lemon Studio project editing.
Instructions
Stop playback and rewind to where it started.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Halts playback and rewinds to the starting position, resetting transport during Lemon Studio project editing.
Stop playback and rewind to where it started.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It usefully discloses the non-obvious side effect of rewinding to where playback started, but it does not clarify what happens if playback is already stopped or whether the call is idempotent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. The action and its key effect are stated immediately.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple no-argument transport action with no output schema, the description gives enough to call it correctly. The main remaining ambiguity is whether 'where it started' refers to the start of playback or another saved position.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The empty schema is complete and the description does not need to explain parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Stop playback'. It also adds the distinctive rewind behavior, which indirectly separates it from pause, but it does not explicitly name pause or any sibling tool.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Usage is implied by 'Stop playback', and the rewind detail hints at when to choose this over pause. However, there is no explicit guidance such as 'use pause to hold position' or 'use transport_status to check state'.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.