Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to cucm-emulator-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    TDQS

    C2.3/5.0

    Scored across 73 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools form parallel legacy and v2 surfaces for the same concepts (e.g., emu_list_active_calls vs emu_list_call_sessions, emu_get_cdr_history vs emu_list_cdr_records, emu_simulate_call vs emu_create_call_session), so an agent must infer which generation to use. The SOAP passthrough tools also overlap with higher-level tools for AXL, RIS, PerfMon, and CDR operations.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The emu_ verb_noun convention is visible, but it is broken by unwieldy endpoint-derived names like emu_post_realtimeservice2_services_risservice70 and emu_post_logcollectionservice_services_dime_get_file_service, as well as by inconsistent verb choices (list/get/inspect/fetch/query, create/generate/upsert/seed/bootstrap). The legacy/v2 distinction is not encoded in names, making the pattern unpredictable.

    Tool Count1/5

    73 tools is far beyond the 50+ threshold and includes extensive meta surfaces (contracts, OpenAPI, scenarios, operation runs, snapshots, evidence) alongside parallel legacy SOAP passthrough endpoints. The core CUCM emulation could be exposed through a much smaller, purpose-built toolset.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers cluster nodes, phones, call sessions, CDR/CMR, CURRI, syslog, publishers, snapshots, and AXL/RIS/serviceability operations, so most domain workflows have a path. Minor gaps remain: phone/node lifecycle is mostly limited to status changes and generic inventory upserts, and canonical v2 lacks some direct update/delete semantics that legacy tools patch over.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues