restart_all_services

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses the stop-all-then-start-all behavior, waiting for completion, and return messages. However, it omits details about whether the operation is synchronous or asynchronous, or potential side effects like service downtime.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description uses a structured format with labeled sections (Tool Role, Core Functions, etc.), which aids readability but adds verbosity. Some redundancy exists (e.g., explaining the stop-start sequence twice). Could be more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters and presence of an output schema, the description sufficiently explains purpose, usage, and return format. It lacks mention of prerequisites or authorization, but these are not critical for a restart tool. Overall adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so the description does not need to add parameter meaning. The baseline is 4 as no parameters are present.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly defines 'restart_all_services' as a dedicated tool for automated bulk restart of all Ambari services, specifying the stop-then-start sequence. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools by explicitly being for 'all services' vs. single-service operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description lists required usage scenarios such as when users request 'restart all services' or for maintenance. It provides clear context but does not explicitly exclude cases where single-service restart tools (e.g., 'restart_service') would be more appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.