Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Atlas UI

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that scans React and Vue projects, extracts component metadata (props, slots, events, imports, usage), and exposes it to AI coding agents via structured tools.
      7
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude structural understanding of a codebase—dependency graph, entry points, complexity ranking, and import cycles—without reading every file into context.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Code intelligence MCP server for Claude Code providing multi-project code graph, semantic search, session history, knowledge base, and web search.
      15
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for real-time analysis of Lovable-generated projects, enabling Claude Desktop to instantly understand project structure, components, dependencies, and more.
      39
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Self-contained MCP server providing type-aware code intelligence for TypeScript, JavaScript, and Vue files, exposing tools like hover, definition, references, and diagnostics to Claude Code without requiring global language server installations.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for project planning inside Claude. It tracks progress, knows your codebase, and resumes exactly where you left off every session.
      12 npm
      5
      -

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of codebase analysis and testing, from finding dead code to auditing templates to verifying data flows. Even tools that seem similar (e.g., check_page vs. render_component vs. capture_flow) have clearly different scopes: one-time snapshot, component rendering, and multi-step flows, respectively. No two tools have overlapping purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using lowercase and underscores (e.g., find_dead_code, get_component_detail, capture_flow). No mixing of conventions like camelCase or different verb styles. The naming is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    21 tools is on the higher end but well-justified for a comprehensive codebase exploration and testing suite. Each tool serves a specific purpose, and the count reflects the breadth of features (catalog browsing, impact analysis, runtime verification, etc.) without feeling excessive.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full lifecycle of codebase analysis: discovery (list/search), inspection (get_component_detail, get_data_flow), dependency mapping (get_dependency_chain, whats_affected), dead code detection, template auditing, runtime verification (check_page, render_component, capture_flow), and even login recovery. There are no obvious gaps for the intended use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues