YNAB MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to YNAB MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables interaction with You Need A Budget (YNAB) via their API, allowing users to manage budgets, accounts, categories, and transactions through natural language.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for interacting with YNAB (You Need A Budget). Provides tools for accessing budget data through MCP-enabled clients like Claude Desktop.4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that allows users to interact with YNAB data, enabling access to account balances, transactions, and the creation of new transactions through the Model Context Protocol.86MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects AI assistants to YNAB budgets, enabling natural language queries about finances backed by full API coverage and built-in YNAB methodology knowledge.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables Claude to interact with YNAB budgets, including listing budgets, accounts, transactions, and category spending.433 npm4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server for YNAB (You Need A Budget). Enables users to query budgets, accounts, categories, transactions, and more, as well as create, update, and delete transactions and manage scheduled transactions from any MCP client.2718 PyPI2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 22 tools
Most tools target distinct resources and actions, and descriptions actively steer away from neighbours (list_months vs cash_flow, list_scheduled_transactions vs detect_recurring vs balance_forecast). The remaining overlap sits in the analytics cluster (spending_by_category, spending_by_payee, cash_flow, plan_summary with budgetVsActuals, list_months), which is disambiguated only by dense prose rather than sharp boundaries. ynab_apply_category_suggestions is also unclear since no companion tool produces the 'suggestions' it consumes.
All names use snake_case with a consistent ynab_ prefix, which makes the set predictable. There is a minor drift between verb_noun names (list_months, create_transaction, move_money) and bare noun phrases (plan_summary, cash_flow, balance_forecast, spending_by_category). The deviation is cosmetic and still readable.
At 22 tools the surface is on the heavy side, but YNAB is a genuinely multi-resource domain (plans, months, accounts, categories, payees, transactions, schedules, analytics) and each tool maps to a real operation. Nothing looks padded purely for the sake of count, though the analytics group could plausibly be consolidated.
Transaction lifecycle is fully covered (get, create, update, delete, bulk approve, import), along with budgeting operations (update_category_budget, move_money, auto_assign). Gaps are mostly where the YNAB API itself is read-only: no create/update/delete for scheduled transactions, accounts, payees, or category groups. A 'get single entity' path is also absent, but list tools plus filters cover it in practice.