get_hotmart_products

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description alone must convey behavioral traits. It mentions the return format (JSON string) and lists parameters, but does not disclose authorization needs, rate limits, or potential impacts. For a read-only listing tool, this is minimally acceptable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description starts with a clear one-line purpose, followed by a structured Args section. It is concise without unnecessary words, though the Args section could be slightly more compact. Still very readable and well-organized.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 5 optional parameters and the presence of an output schema (reducing need to describe return values), the description covers the main usage. However, it lacks any mention of authentication, rate limits, or pagination mechanics beyond the page_token parameter. It is complete enough for basic use but could be improved.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds significant meaning beyond the schema by enumerating each parameter with explanations, default values, and options (e.g., status and format enums, max_results limit, product_id format). With 0% schema coverage, this is crucial and well done.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get list of products from Hotmart account', specifying the verb 'get' and the resource 'products'. This distinguishes it from the sibling tool 'get_hotmart_sales_history', which retrieves sales history.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs the sibling tool, nor does it mention prerequisites or when not to use it. Implicitly, the difference is clear (products vs sales history), but no exclusions are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.