Skip to main content
Glama
calibre-mcp

calibre-mcp

by caelum29

Related Servers

Alternatives to calibre-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables semantic search over local Calibre libraries via MCP, allowing AI assistants to query books, annotations, and export bibliographies while keeping data private.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables conversational management of a Calibre ebook library via MCP, including search, metadata editing, adding, converting, deduplicating, removing, and emailing books with human-in-the-loop safety.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables bibliographic research on a private local Calibre library by providing read-only metadata search, book inspection, and optional RAG-based content retrieval through MCP.
      5
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server to manage and organize a Calibre ebook library, enabling metadata editing, search, conversion, and more through AI assistants.
      17
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables browsing, searching, and quote verification of a local ebook library via MCP, providing deterministic RAG with no embeddings or network.
      6
      77 PyPI
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools map to clearly distinct actions (list, get, build_index, find_duplicates, quality_report), and the two search tools are separated by lengthy guidance on keyword vs. meaning vs. hybrid. The main friction is that calibre_search and calibre_semantic_search overlap in mode/scope combinations, and two tools (calibre_board_data, calibre_open_book) are explicitly marked 'do not call as the model', which is a selection hazard for an agent scanning the surface.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool uses the same calibre_ prefix plus a snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_libraries, search, semantic_search, build_index, get_book, get_content, get_figures, list_categories, find_duplicates, quality_report, recover_metadata). The only outlier, calibre_ping, is a conventional health-check name and does not break predictability.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 14 tools the set is well within a reasonable range for a library/search domain, and each tool covers a real capability (index build, search, extraction, figures, dedupe, quality). Two of the fourteen are internal widget endpoints that a model should never call, so the effective model-facing surface is slightly smaller than the count suggests.

    Completeness3/5

    The read/lookup surface is thorough, but the write half of the lifecycle is missing: there is no calibre_update_book or delete/add tool, and descriptions explicitly reference calibre_update_book and calibre_manage_bundles, neither of which exists in the set. calibre_recover_metadata therefore dead-ends — it returns a changes object meant for a tool the agent cannot call.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessLimited data