mcp-server-zwave-js-ui
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-server-zwave-js-ui
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables LLMs to list, inspect, and control Zigbee devices via the Zigbee2MQTT frontend websocket API, eliminating the need for direct MQTT broker access.4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with Home Assistant, control smart home devices, query states, execute services, and manage automations via natural language.7731,054 PyPI4,867MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for full Home Assistant control, enabling AI agents to manage dashboards, automations, files, apps, entities, and more via REST API, WebSocket, and SSH.66113 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA thin MCP server that securely enables AI agents to interact with Home Assistant, Mealie, and Nirvana via tools for automation, recipe management, and task tracking, while keeping credentials hidden.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for administering a Zigbee2MQTT estate, enabling mesh health monitoring, device management, firmware updates, pairing, binding, and reporting via natural language.1769 npm31MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for OpenHAB v5+ that exposes the entire REST API as tools for AI models, enabling complete control over items, things, rules, persistence, and semantic model.257MIT
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Each tool targets a distinct Z-Wave operation (e.g., add association vs remove association, begin inclusion vs stop inclusion, node info vs node config vs node values). There is no functional overlap between tools, and descriptions clearly differentiate their purposes.
All tool names follow a consistent 'zwave_verb_noun' pattern in snake_case (e.g., zwave_add_association, zwave_list_nodes, zwave_set_value). Verbs are action-oriented and nouns clearly indicate the resource, making the convention predictable across all 24 tools.
24 tools is on the higher side of typical, but the Z-Wave domain requires many distinct operations (network management, node configuration, value control, associations). Each tool serves a well-defined purpose without redundancy, so the count is justified and not excessive.
The tool surface covers core Z-Wave workflows: node discovery, configuration, value setting, associations, inclusion/exclusion, route rebuilding, and firmware status. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no firmware update trigger, incomplete S2 secure inclusion), but these are explicitly noted and do not significantly impair common tasks.