Skip to main content
Glama
cacack

mcp-server-brewfather

by cacack

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-server-brewfather

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server exposing Brewfather brewing data—batches, recipes, fermentation readings, and inventory—as tools for natural language queries.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to interact with the Tulip manufacturing platform, providing access to tables, records, machines, stations, interfaces, users, and other manufacturing operations through the Tulip API.
      30
      13 npm
      6
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an AI agent to query a warehouse management system for orders, stock, stalled orders, and audit logs, and to make narrowly scoped writes by changing order status with a required reason or appending notes, with all writes recorded in a full audit trail.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Wraps the Brewman Web (V7) API to read and write Brewman data (orders, outlets, stock, config) via tools, with the API token stored securely as an environment variable.
      -

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource+action: recipes (find/get/create/update), batches (find/get/update/readings/brewtracker), and inventory (list/set/create/update). The only potentially confusable pair, set_inventory vs update_inventory_item, is explicitly disambiguated in the descriptions (stock vs details).

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names are uniformly snake_case verb_noun (get_batch, create_recipe, update_inventory_item), which is predictable and readable. Minor deviation: enumeration-style operations mix 'find' (find_recipes, find_batches) and 'list' (list_inventory), and single-item reads use 'get', which is a slight inconsistency but semantically motivated.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well within the ideal range and each one earns its place, mapping cleanly onto the three domains (recipes, batches, inventory) without redundancy. No thin single-tool areas and no bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    Read/update coverage is strong across recipes, batches, and inventory, including specialized reads (readings, brewtracker) and careful split of inventory stock vs details. Gaps: no delete operations for recipes or inventory items, and no batch creation or log/event writing, though these are minor for a primarily read-and-adjust workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessWithin a week