Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mnemonic-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Persistent memory MCP server that stores and retrieves memories in Markdown files, enabling shared context across multiple AI agents with hybrid search and deduplication.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a file-first personal memory layer for AI agents, enabling them to store and retrieve memories as markdown files with an SQLite index. The MCP server offers read-only search by default, with optional write tools for manual memory addition and conflict resolution.
      1 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for persistent, cross-session, local-first memory for AI agents, storing memories as Markdown files with SQLite indexing for hybrid search.
      24
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server providing persistent, local-first memory for AI agents via Markdown files in a git repo, with search, branching, and auditability.
      8 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A portable memory server for MCP that stores durable memories as markdown files, enabling AI agents to create, search, and organize persistent knowledge.
      11
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct actions, but save_memory, auto_save, and save_to_section overlap in purpose, and read_memory/search_memory/list_sections have fuzzy boundaries without clear parameter detail. Descriptions reduce but do not eliminate confusion.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The dominant pattern is verb_noun: read_memory, save_memory, update_memory, delete_memory, search_memory, list_sections. auto_save breaks the pattern slightly, and save_to_section/replace_section use prepositions, but the overall naming style is recognizable and consistent enough.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is a reasonable size for a memory management server. Each tool covers a distinct facet of reading, writing, organizing, searching, or maintaining persistent memory without feeling padded.

    Completeness4/5

    The memory domain is well covered with CRUD operations, search, section management, and maintenance. Minor gaps include no explicit 'list all memory at once' tool and no dedicated 'delete section' operation, but these can be worked around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues