mnemonic-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to mnemonic-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenancePersistent memory MCP server that stores and retrieves memories in Markdown files, enabling shared context across multiple AI agents with hybrid search and deduplication.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides a file-first personal memory layer for AI agents, enabling them to store and retrieve memories as markdown files with an SQLite index. The MCP server offers read-only search by default, with optional write tools for manual memory addition and conflict resolution.1 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for persistent, cross-session, local-first memory for AI agents, storing memories as Markdown files with SQLite indexing for hybrid search.24Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceLocal-first memory server for AI coding agents that stores work sessions, tasks, and durable memories in Markdown files, exposed through MCP tools for session management and memory retrieval.106 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server providing persistent, local-first memory for AI agents via Markdown files in a git repo, with search, branching, and auditability.8 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA portable memory server for MCP that stores durable memories as markdown files, enabling AI agents to create, search, and organize persistent knowledge.117MIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Most tools target distinct actions, but save_memory, auto_save, and save_to_section overlap in purpose, and read_memory/search_memory/list_sections have fuzzy boundaries without clear parameter detail. Descriptions reduce but do not eliminate confusion.
The dominant pattern is verb_noun: read_memory, save_memory, update_memory, delete_memory, search_memory, list_sections. auto_save breaks the pattern slightly, and save_to_section/replace_section use prepositions, but the overall naming style is recognizable and consistent enough.
Ten tools is a reasonable size for a memory management server. Each tool covers a distinct facet of reading, writing, organizing, searching, or maintaining persistent memory without feeling padded.
The memory domain is well covered with CRUD operations, search, section management, and maintenance. Minor gaps include no explicit 'list all memory at once' tool and no dedicated 'delete section' operation, but these can be worked around.