Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to cabal-radar-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for real-time Solana token risk analysis. Cross-references RugCheck.xyz, DexScreener, and GoPlus Security to generate three-layer reports: machine verdict → LLM analysis → raw on-chain evidence. Live on Solana mainnet with USDC micropayments ($0.02/audit). Give any AI agent the ability to check if a token is safe before trading.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP hosts and AI agents to request pay-per-call token risk assessments for contract addresses across Base, Ethereum, and Solana, returning a verdict, 0–100 risk score, six market-structure signals, and an analyst summary, with payment handled via x402 USDC on Base.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to analyze Solana wallets for realized PnL, win rate, trading cadence, and smart-money, bot, or exchange-like flags, plus screen trending tokens for liquidity, volume, and rug risk. Exposes wallet quick checks, full profiles, free previews, and trending-token scans as MCP tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform DeFi safety checks over MCP, including pre-signing transaction simulation, sanctions and scam address screening, token rug checks, risk-scored launches, and liquidation-risk assessment.
      892 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a fairly distinct target: free single-token scan, bundler detection, funding-cluster tracing, batch audit, and two licensing tools. The main ambiguity is between scan_token_safety and the Pro analysis tools, since an agent might not immediately know whether a risk scan already subsumes bundler/funding checks, but descriptions clarify the Pro/free split.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case with a leading verb (scan_, get_, activate_, detect_, trace_, batch_audit_), which is highly predictable. 'batch_audit_watchlist' is a slight deviation since 'batch' modifies the verb rather than being the verb itself, but it remains readable and consistent in style.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a token-safety service with a free tier and a Pro tier. Each tool covers a distinct capability (scan, bundler detection, funding trace, batch audit, upgrade info, license activation) and none feels redundant or filler.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: free scanning, multiple Pro analyses, batch auditing, and license info plus activation. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit license-status or deactivation check, but agents can work around this via get_pro_upgrade_info.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessOutdated data