No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: evaluate runs the quality analysis, explain_rule provides details on a specific rule, and list_analyzers checks analyzer health. No overlap or ambiguity in selection.
Two tools follow a verb_noun pattern (explain_rule, list_analyzers), while evaluate is a bare verb. This minor deviation is still readable and consistent in snake_case, but prevents a perfect score.
Three tools are well-scoped for a focused code-quality analysis server; each tool (evaluate, explain_rule, list_analyzers) earns its place without redundancy.
The surface covers running evaluations, explaining rules, and checking analyzer availability, but lacks a way to list all rules or dimensions directly. This minor gap is workable via evaluate findings, but agents cannot discover rules upfront.