Skip to main content
Glama
bzsasson

Screaming Frog SEO Spider MCP Server

by bzsasson
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Screaming Frog SEO Spider MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • screaming-frog-mcp

      mshahiddigital
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables driving the Screaming Frog SEO Spider from any MCP client to perform headless crawls, get a prioritized issue register, analyze crawl data, and generate shareable reports, all without the GUI and on the free tier.
      11
      2
      MIT

    • screaming-frog-mcp

      YerayRodri
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to analyze Screaming Frog SEO Spider crawl files directly, offering SEO audits, issue summaries, custom SQL queries, and comparisons without manual exports.
      MIT

    • Crawl4AI MCP

      laurentvv
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to crawl websites, extract dynamic content, navigate links, and save structured Markdown files via the MCP protocol, with support for anti-bot bypass, CSS selectors, and custom JavaScript execution.
      1
      42
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct step in the crawl lifecycle: install check, start, status, list, storage, export, read, aggregate, and delete. Even the most similar pair, read_crawl_data and aggregate_crawl_data, is clearly separated by row-level versus count/group-by output.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern (crawl_site, export_crawl, delete_crawl), but sf_check is a noun_verb exception and storage_summary is noun-only. The naming is still predictable and readable overall.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools cover crawl initiation, monitoring, storage management, export, data access, and cleanup without redundancy. The count is appropriate for the server's focused SEO crawling purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The full crawl workflow is covered: start, check status, list crawls, export results, read/aggregate data, and delete to free space. The main gap is no way to stop or cancel an in-progress background crawl, which could leave agents with no abort path for long-running crawls.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources