Skip to main content
Glama
byteplant-devops

Byteplant Validator MCP Server

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to Byteplant Validator MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to validate email addresses locally before sending or saving them, detecting typos, disposable domains, dead domains, bad syntax, role addresses, duplicates, and provider information.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Comprehensive email validation MCP server that checks syntax, MX records, disposable domains, role-based accounts, SPF/DKIM, typo suggestions, and risk scoring.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to validate email addresses and phone numbers before saving or using them, including syntax, DNS/MX checks, disposable domains, role addresses, typo suggestions, and phone number formats. Supports bulk email validation for up to 50 addresses in a single call.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables real-time email verification via MCP tools, checking syntax, MX, disposable domains, and optional SMTP probe to determine deliverability with a VALID/RISKY/INVALID verdict.
      2
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides an MCP tool to verify email addresses, returning valid, invalid, risky, or error statuses via the InboxValid API. It includes a mock API and retry logic for robust, type-safe verification.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct data type (email, address, phone) with no overlap in purpose. An agent can easily select the correct tool based on input type.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the same predictable verb_noun pattern: validate_email, validate_address, validate_phone. No naming deviations or mixed conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools cleanly cover the three core validation domains. The count is well-scoped with each tool earning its place.

    Completeness5/5

    The server provides complete validation coverage for email, postal address, and phone number, which are the primary contact-data validation needs. No obvious missing operations for a read-only validation service.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues