Skip to main content
Glama
bymcs

MS SQL Server MCP Server

by bymcs

Related Servers

Alternatives to MS SQL Server MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with MSSQL databases through natural language, supporting CRUD operations and schema management.
      2,592 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to interact with Microsoft SQL Server databases through natural language, translating prompts into structured queries and returning clean results for AI-powered data access.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables secure interaction with Microsoft SQL Server databases, allowing schema exploration, metadata retrieval, and read-only query execution through natural language.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Microsoft SQL Server databases through query execution, schema discovery, CRUD operations, stored procedures, and data export with built-in safety controls.
      18
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to query and manage MSSQL databases using natural language, supporting CRUD operations and schema management.
      2,592 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Microsoft SQL Server databases through a standardized interface. Supports executing SQL queries, browsing database schemas, and viewing table data with flexible authentication options for both local and Azure SQL databases.
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools are duplicates with different names (e.g., mssql_get_table_data vs mssql_read_table_rows, mssql_execute_query vs mssql_run_sql_query). Descriptions clearly mark deprecated aliases, reducing confusion, but the presence of both still creates ambiguity about which to use.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Tool names follow a mssql_ prefix but use inconsistent verb patterns: connect/disconnect, get/run/execute/list/describe/read. The deprecated aliases introduce further inconsistency (e.g., get_table_data vs read_table_rows, execute_procedure vs execute_stored_procedure). No uniform verb_noun convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    14 tools is within the acceptable range, but 5 are deprecated aliases, inflating the count and adding redundancy. The unique tool set is about 9, which is well-scoped. Slightly heavier than needed but not excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers core SQL Server operations: connection management, arbitrary query execution, table reads, schema listing, column descriptions, stored procedures, and database listing. Arbitrary SQL covers writes, so no major dead ends. Minor gaps include no transaction control or bulk operation tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow