wireshark_extract_dns_queries

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description discloses extraction behavior, return format (tabular text or JSON error), and default limit. However, lacks explicit statement of read-only nature, error handling, or performance considerations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: one-line purpose, structured args section, returns, and example. No unnecessary words. Front-loaded with key info.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a simple extraction tool with 2 parameters and output schema exists. But lacks contextual details like file size limits, supported pcap versions, or interaction with other tools. Could be more informative for an agent unfamiliar with Wireshark.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but description provides clear meaning for both parameters: pcap_file as path, limit as max queries with default. Compensates for missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'extract DNS query details (name, type)', specific verb and resource. Differentiates from siblings like wireshark_extract_http_requests by focusing on DNS.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use vs alternatives like wireshark_detect_dns_tunnel or other extract tools. Only says 'Pre-configured for DNS analysis', which implies DNS context but no explicit use cases or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.