ssh_tunnel_list
List active SSH tunnels with optional filtering by server name to monitor open connections.
Instructions
List active SSH tunnels
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| server | No | Filter by server name |
List active SSH tunnels with optional filtering by server name to monitor open connections.
List active SSH tunnels
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| server | No | Filter by server name |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must cover behavior. It only states 'list active SSH tunnels' without disclosing authentication needs, impact, or output details.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no filler. Perfectly concise and front-loaded with the key action.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool is simple (one optional param, no output schema), but description lacks context about output or what 'active' means. Adequate but not enriched.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema has 100% coverage on parameter descriptions (e.g., 'Filter by server name'), so description adds no extra meaning. Baseline 3 per instructions when schema coverage is high.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'List active SSH tunnels', using specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like ssh_tunnel_create and ssh_tunnel_close.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any conditions or prerequisites. The description simply states the action without context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bvisible/mcp-ssh-manager'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server