Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to searxng-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible clients to perform web searches through a self-hosted SearXNG instance, with support for configurable languages, categories, time ranges, and safe search settings.
      2
      273 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to perform web searches through a self-hosted SearXNG instance, offering privacy-focused metasearch without API keys or vendor lock-in.
      3
      BSD 3-Clause
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Free web search MCP server using SearXNG, supporting web search, news search, and search summaries.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for local web search via SearXNG, providing unlimited queries without API keys or cost, with automatic fallback to public instances.
      3
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Privacy-focused web search MCP server using SearXNG with Streamable HTTP transport, supporting authentication and advanced search parameters.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The typed *_search tools (image/music/news/paper/video) overlap with the generic search, but descriptions explicitly direct users to prefer the dedicated tools, making boundaries clear. The fetch-family tools (search_and_fetch, fetch_content, crawl_site, deep_search) also overlap somewhat but each has a distinct stated use case (snippets vs. full page vs. site survey vs. multi-source research).

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all names are snake_case with a clear noun+search or verb+noun pattern (image_search, fetch_content, crawl_site, list_engines). Minor deviations are single-word names (autocomplete, doctor) and noun-first ordering, but overall the convention is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is a well-scoped count for a web-search server, covering vertical searches, fetching, crawling, diagnostics and autocomplete without redundancy bloat. Each tool earns its place with a distinct capability.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers a broad domain: multi-vertical search, autocomplete, content fetching/crawling, deep research and instance diagnostics, forming a coherent lifecycle. Minor gaps like batch ref fetching or structured result caching controls exist but are workable around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive