Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Housewarden

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Alexa+ and other MCP clients to manage a household's shared shopping list, bills, chores, and pantry expiry through natural-language voice interactions. It provides read-only briefings and confirmation-gated updates for recurring household logistics.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language household planning by exposing 18 stateful tools that read a household profile and pantry, fetch live weather, plan meals under diet, allergy, time, and budget constraints, compute missing ingredients, and draft shopping lists and tasks — all pending explicit confirmation before any mutation is applied. Supports a full auditable workflow with real persistence, honest fallback behavior, and optional advisory AI and snapshot mirroring.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an Alexa+-style assistant to run household routines with cross-session memory of members, allergies, budgets, curfews and past decisions, autonomously re-planning when new observations contradict the original plan. It also serves card and carousel UI resources for screen detail and gates any spending behind an explicit spoken confirmation.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Alexa+ to coordinate a household through 14 MCP tools: it tracks family members, auto-assigns and completes chores by workload, adds calendar events while reporting clashes, rotates pickup duty, manages a grocery list, and returns a spoken morning briefing with reasoning for every decision.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 31 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: chores, shopping, reminders, bills, devices, budget, members, and audit. Within each domain, verbs like list/add/get/update/complete clearly separate operations. No two tools appear to perform the same function, and even similar actions like confirm_action and reject_action are unambiguous opposites.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_chores, add_bill, set_device_state, verify_audit_chain). The only minor variation is 'check_off_shopping_item' using a phrasal verb, but it remains readable and consistent with the overall style. Naming is highly predictable, aiding agent tool selection.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 31 tools, the server is well beyond the typical 3–15 tool range and into the 'too many' category (25+). While each tool appears purposeful and maps to a specific operation, the sheer number could overwhelm an agent and suggests possible consolidation. The count feels more like a complete application API than a scoped MCP tool surface.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the major lifecycle operations for its domains: chores can be added, assigned, completed, and rotated; bills have full CRUD plus marking paid; reminders support add/cancel; the audit log supports reading and verification. Minor gaps exist (no delete chore, no remove member, no edit reminder), but agents can work around them, and overall coverage is robust.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues