Housewarden
Related Servers
Alternatives to Housewarden
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-powered household management including inventory tracking, restock predictions, meal planning from available ingredients, and baby supply monitoring through natural language commands.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables households to manage appliance inventories, manuals, warranties, and maintenance through natural-language voice interactions, with grounded troubleshooting and consumable reordering.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Alexa+ to manage household admin tasks: checking upcoming bills, verifying funding, detecting anomalies, auto-handling routine payments, and escalating only when a human decision is required.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables families to manage shared expenses, income, budgets, and financial reports through natural language, with all data stored in PostgreSQL and exposed as MCP tools to compatible LLM clients.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables households and small teams to monitor bills and subscriptions, receive evidence-backed saving proposals, and execute actions only after a signed, scope-capped mandate, with every decision and refusal logged in an auditable ledger.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables voice-first household maintenance tracking, turning spoken updates into durable records, service history, and due-date reminders for a concise maintenance brief.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 31 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: chores, shopping, reminders, bills, devices, budget, members, and audit. Within each domain, verbs like list/add/get/update/complete clearly separate operations. No two tools appear to perform the same function, and even similar actions like confirm_action and reject_action are unambiguous opposites.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_chores, add_bill, set_device_state, verify_audit_chain). The only minor variation is 'check_off_shopping_item' using a phrasal verb, but it remains readable and consistent with the overall style. Naming is highly predictable, aiding agent tool selection.
With 31 tools, the server is well beyond the typical 3–15 tool range and into the 'too many' category (25+). While each tool appears purposeful and maps to a specific operation, the sheer number could overwhelm an agent and suggests possible consolidation. The count feels more like a complete application API than a scoped MCP tool surface.
The tool surface covers the major lifecycle operations for its domains: chores can be added, assigned, completed, and rotated; bills have full CRUD plus marking paid; reminders support add/cancel; the audit log supports reading and verification. Minor gaps exist (no delete chore, no remove member, no edit reminder), but agents can work around them, and overall coverage is robust.