Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Housewarden

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Alexa+ to manage household admin tasks: checking upcoming bills, verifying funding, detecting anomalies, auto-handling routine payments, and escalating only when a human decision is required.
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables families to manage shared expenses, income, budgets, and financial reports through natural language, with all data stored in PostgreSQL and exposed as MCP tools to compatible LLM clients.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables households and small teams to monitor bills and subscriptions, receive evidence-backed saving proposals, and execute actions only after a signed, scope-capped mandate, with every decision and refusal logged in an auditable ledger.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables voice-first household maintenance tracking, turning spoken updates into durable records, service history, and due-date reminders for a concise maintenance brief.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 31 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: chores, shopping, reminders, bills, devices, budget, members, and audit. Within each domain, verbs like list/add/get/update/complete clearly separate operations. No two tools appear to perform the same function, and even similar actions like confirm_action and reject_action are unambiguous opposites.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_chores, add_bill, set_device_state, verify_audit_chain). The only minor variation is 'check_off_shopping_item' using a phrasal verb, but it remains readable and consistent with the overall style. Naming is highly predictable, aiding agent tool selection.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 31 tools, the server is well beyond the typical 3–15 tool range and into the 'too many' category (25+). While each tool appears purposeful and maps to a specific operation, the sheer number could overwhelm an agent and suggests possible consolidation. The count feels more like a complete application API than a scoped MCP tool surface.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the major lifecycle operations for its domains: chores can be added, assigned, completed, and rotated; bills have full CRUD plus marking paid; reminders support add/cancel; the audit log supports reading and verification. Minor gaps exist (no delete chore, no remove member, no edit reminder), but agents can work around them, and overall coverage is robust.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues