Skip to main content
Glama
buildfound

MCP Server Template

by buildfound

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Server Template

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight TypeScript-based MCP server that demonstrates how to build custom MCP tools by implementing a simple addition calculator. Serves as a starting point for building MCP-compatible tools.
      2,031 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A minimal TypeScript MCP starter server that counts words and characters, ready to extend with custom tools.
      1
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A production-ready TypeScript MCP server providing basic tools (add, echo, timestamp), resources (server info, greetings, data access), and prompt templates (analyze, code-review, summarize). Serves as a foundation for building custom MCP servers with extensible architecture.
      289 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A boilerplate project for quickly developing MCP servers using TypeScript, featuring example implementations of tools (calculator, greetings) and resources (server info) with Zod schema validation.
      ISC

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools target completely disjoint domains: `add` performs numeric addition and `word_stats` performs text analysis. There is no plausible way for an agent to confuse one with the other.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    `add` is a bare verb while `word_stats` is a noun phrase, so the two names follow different conventions. With only two tools there is no discernible pattern to learn from.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is thin even for a template server, and they are unrelated utilities rather than a coherent capability set. The count is not harmful, but it sits at the borderline of feeling under-scoped.

    Completeness3/5

    Each tool is self-contained and appears to fully cover its tiny operation, so there are no obvious internal gaps. However, there is no unifying domain, so coverage cannot be meaningfully assessed and the surface is minimal for any real workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues