A
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and retrieve Sangmyung University regulations, articles, and forms from the university's rule management system.
MIT
dongguk-rule-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to dongguk-rule-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving regulations from the Hansung University regulation management system.43 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI programs to search and retrieve approved public regulations with citations, supporting PDF, HWP, HWPX, and DOCX formats.43MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and retrieve Korean laws, regulations, administrative rules, legal interpretations, and precedents via official APIs for legal review workflows.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server to search and retrieve regulations from 14 Korean universities' regulation management systems. Supports querying, listing, and viewing full text or specific articles.49 npm2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI to search and retrieve South Korean legal information from the National Law Information Center. It allows users to look up specific laws, articles, and detailed legal provisions using natural language queries.132-
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 10 tools
Disambiguation4/5
The toolset establishes a clear primary entry point (lookup_dongguk_rule) and explicitly labels search_rule, search_rule_deep, get_rule_content, and get_rule_toc as auxiliary, so the intended hierarchy is mostly clear. However, multiple overlapping retrieval/search tools still create some risk of misselection for an agent that does not carefully follow the Korean-language guidance.
Naming Consistency4/5
All names use snake_case and are mostly verb_noun (get_rule_toc, list_rule_history, search_rule_deep, verify_rule_citations). The adjective_noun 'applicable_rule' is a minor outlier, and auxiliary qualifiers like 'deep' and 'dongguk' are not fully systematic, but overall naming is predictable.
Tool Count5/5
Ten tools is well within the appropriate range for a regulation-domain server, and each covers a distinct operation: primary lookup, candidate search, content/TOC retrieval, history, version comparison, date-applicable lookup, citation verification, and service info. No tool appears purely redundant at the count level.
Completeness4/5
Coverage is broad: search, retrieval, TOC, history, version diff, point-in-time lookup, citation verification, and service diagnostics are all present. A minor gap is the absence of a direct 'get full regulation by LAW_ID' tool without first querying or drilling into the TOC/article, though agents can work around it.
Maintenance
ActivityNo data
ResponsivenessSyncing