Skip to main content
Glama
btanaji

TradingView MCP

by btanaji

Related Servers

Alternatives to TradingView MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides real-time market data, technical analysis, screeners, and backtesting for stocks, crypto, forex, and futures across global exchanges, enabling AI assistants to fetch quotes, indicators, and strategy results via natural language.
      37
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to pull live market data, including quotes, technical indicators, charts, and TradingView screeners, through MCP tools.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants in MCP clients to query real-time market data, inspect portfolio and Web3 wallet balances across brokers, place protected equity/ETF, crypto, forex, options, DeFi swap, and prediction market orders, and run backtests.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive stock market data and technical analysis tools via the MCP protocol, enabling real-time quotes, historical data, and professional indicators like RSI and MACD for Claude Desktop and other clients.
      5
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents access to 336 real-time and historical market, quant, SEC filing, insider trading, fundamentals, and macro data tools via MCP Streamable HTTP.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools have overlapping purposes: egx_sector_scan vs egx_sector_scanner, several volume scanners (smart_volume_scanner, volume_breakout_scanner, volume_confirmation_analysis), and multiple single-symbol analysis tools (coin_analysis, multi_timeframe_analysis, combined_analysis, multi_agent_analysis) that could be confused. The descriptions try to differentiate, but the sheer number of near-synonyms creates meaningful misselection risk.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names use a mix of conventions: most are snake_case verb_noun (bollinger_scan, combined_analysis) but others are noun-only (yahoo_price, market_snapshot) or use inconsistent verb choices (scan vs scanner, e.g., egx_sector_scan vs egx_sector_scanner). Domain prefixes (egx_, futures_, stock_) help, but the overall pattern is not uniform.

    Tool Count2/5

    37 tools is well above the comfortable range and suggests a kitchen-sink approach. Many tools are highly niche (egx_fibonacci_retracement, egx_trade_plan, stock_options_unusual_activity) and could be grouped into separate sub-servers. The count overwhelms the nominal purpose and increases selection difficulty.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers a broad range of trading analysis: quotes, technicals, scanners, backtesting, news, options, futures, and EGX-specific features. However, there are notable gaps such as no stock fundamentals, no economic calendar, and no portfolio/watchlist management. Some workflows also dead-end, like lacking a dedicated futures single-contract quote tool, relying instead on coin_analysis.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues