Skip to main content
Glama
btanaji

TradingView MCP

by btanaji

Related Servers

Alternatives to TradingView MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides real-time market data, technical analysis, screeners, and backtesting for stocks, crypto, forex, and futures across global exchanges, enabling AI assistants to fetch quotes, indicators, and strategy results via natural language.
      2
      37
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to pull live market data, including quotes, technical indicators, charts, and TradingView screeners, through MCP tools.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants in MCP clients to query real-time market data, inspect portfolio and Web3 wallet balances across brokers, place protected equity/ETF, crypto, forex, options, DeFi swap, and prediction market orders, and run backtests.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive stock market data and technical analysis tools via the MCP protocol, enabling real-time quotes, historical data, and professional indicators like RSI and MACD for Claude Desktop and other clients.
      5
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents access to 336 real-time and historical market, quant, SEC filing, insider trading, fundamentals, and macro data tools via MCP Streamable HTTP.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools have overlapping purposes: egx_sector_scan vs egx_sector_scanner, several volume scanners (smart_volume_scanner, volume_breakout_scanner, volume_confirmation_analysis), and multiple single-symbol analysis tools (coin_analysis, multi_timeframe_analysis, combined_analysis, multi_agent_analysis) that could be confused. The descriptions try to differentiate, but the sheer number of near-synonyms creates meaningful misselection risk.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names use a mix of conventions: most are snake_case verb_noun (bollinger_scan, combined_analysis) but others are noun-only (yahoo_price, market_snapshot) or use inconsistent verb choices (scan vs scanner, e.g., egx_sector_scan vs egx_sector_scanner). Domain prefixes (egx_, futures_, stock_) help, but the overall pattern is not uniform.

    Tool Count2/5

    37 tools is well above the comfortable range and suggests a kitchen-sink approach. Many tools are highly niche (egx_fibonacci_retracement, egx_trade_plan, stock_options_unusual_activity) and could be grouped into separate sub-servers. The count overwhelms the nominal purpose and increases selection difficulty.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers a broad range of trading analysis: quotes, technicals, scanners, backtesting, news, options, futures, and EGX-specific features. However, there are notable gaps such as no stock fundamentals, no economic calendar, and no portfolio/watchlist management. Some workflows also dead-end, like lacking a dedicated futures single-contract quote tool, relying instead on coin_analysis.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues