logout

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral disclosure burden. It clearly discloses that login is revoked and the local session is deleted, signaling destructive side effects. It could elaborate on remote-session consequences, but the key behavior is transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences front-load the action and consequence, then explain the required parameter. Every sentence earns its place with no filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a one-parameter tool with an output schema, and the description covers the sole behavioral requirement (confirm=true) plus side effects. An agent has everything needed to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema only provides a boolean confirm with a default of false and no description, so 0% schema coverage. The description adds the crucial semantic that confirm must be true because logging out revokes authorization, fully compensating for the schema gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description names a specific action (logout from Telegram account) and a concrete side effect (deleting the local session), which unambiguously distinguishes it from auth_status and login_* siblings. The verb and resource are clear and non-tautological.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states that confirm=true is required because logout cancels the userbot authorization. It does not discuss alternatives or when-not-to-use, but no sibling tool performs the same action, so this is reasonable guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.