Skip to main content
Glama
bsmi021

MCP Task Manager Server

by bsmi021

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Task Manager Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A project management MCP server that exposes create_task, list_tasks, and update_task tools backed by SQLite for task tracking.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A personal task management MCP server that allows LLM clients to create, read, update, and delete tasks with projects, labels, and comments, using a local SQLite database that can also be accessed via a web UI.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage projects, roadmaps, periods, and tasks through MCP tools, backed by a local SQLite database with schema validation.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local, project-scoped requirement management MCP server that enables AI agents to manage tasks and requirements via SQLite.
      5 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server implementing a Getting Things Done assistant with tools for tasks, projects, inbox, next actions, and statistics. Supports local SQLite and Databricks deployment.
      17
      -

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. For example, 'addTask' creates a new task, 'updateTask' modifies an existing one, 'showTask' retrieves a single task, and 'listTasks' retrieves multiple tasks, all with well-defined boundaries. Tools like 'getNextTask' and 'expandTask' offer unique functionality that doesn't overlap with others.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern throughout, such as 'addTask', 'createProject', 'deleteProject', 'exportProject', and 'importProject'. There is one minor deviation with 'showTask' (where 'getTask' might be more consistent with 'getNextTask'), but overall the pattern is highly predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 12 tools, the count is well-scoped for a task management server, covering core operations like CRUD for tasks and projects, status management, and advanced features like import/export and task breakdown. Each tool earns its place without feeling excessive or insufficient for the domain.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete CRUD/lifecycle coverage for task management, including project creation, deletion, import/export, and task operations from addition to deletion, status updates, and retrieval. There are no obvious gaps; agents can manage tasks end-to-end without dead ends, such as handling dependencies, priorities, and hierarchical structures.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues