live_parameter_set

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Mentions validation but doesn't disclose behavior like coercion or rejection details. 'coerce' parameter modifies behavior, but not described. Partial transparency only.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, very concise. No wasted words, but could benefit from slight expansion. Good structure for a short description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 5 parameters, nested objects, and no output schema, description is too minimal. Lacks explanation of return values, parameter interactions (e.g., coerce), and behavior on invalid input. Incomplete for this complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is low (40%). Description adds context about validation for 'value' and implies 'coerce' usage, but doesn't explain 'ref' nested object or 'expected_set_signature'. Adds some value beyond schema but insufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'Set', resource 'one DeviceParameter value', and adds validation context with min/max and quantized validation. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'live_batch' and 'live_set'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives. Sibling 'live_set' might overlap, but description doesn't differentiate. No when-not-to-use or prerequisites mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.