Skip to main content
Glama
brystal00

MSIO

by brystal00
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MSIO

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • housecallpro-mcp

      NoBanks
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Housecall Pro, providing 5 tools for AI agents to register customers, schedule jobs, create estimates, log leads, and generate invoices (env-gated).
      5
      MIT

    • kickserv-mcp

      Willbrownfield007
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Kickserv field service management that enables AI agents to read and manage customers, jobs, and invoices through natural language.
      7
      -

    • Agent Broker

      basilalshukaili
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An agent-callable MCP server that lets autonomous AI agents find, verify, message, schedule with, and transact with small and mid-sized businesses through a single compliance-enforced tool surface.
      MIT
    • mmc-mcp by modelmycontext

      mmc-mcpofficial

      modelmycontext
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets AI agents execute structured business processes by exposing process steps as tools with a sequenced event bus to prevent skipping steps.
      1
      -

    • Oktyv

      duke-of-beans
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to execute real-world actions through 10 specialized engines covering authenticated API calls, browser automation, visual QA, shell commands, file operations, job scraping, and parallel task execution.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 36 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource or workflow, and direct overlaps (e.g., hcp_list_invoices vs hcp_list_job_invoices vs msio_ar_aging) are explicitly differentiated with USE WHEN/DO NOT USE WHEN guidance. The hcp_* resource actions and msio_* analytics tools are clearly separated in purpose.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The hcp_* tools follow a predictable verb_noun pattern, while the msio_* analytics tools mostly use descriptive noun phrases rather than actions. The lone get_pricing_reference tool breaks the prefix convention, making the overall scheme mixed but still readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    36 tools is on the heavy side, especially when many are narrow read/list endpoints plus a separate analytics layer. While each tool is individually justified, the combined surface is larger than an agent can efficiently evaluate in one pass.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers job creation, scheduling, notes, line items, tags, invoices, and a rich analytics layer, but several lifecycle gaps exist: no customer create/update, no estimate creation or update, no invoice get-by-id, and no update/delete operations for many core objects. These are notable but workable gaps given the read-heavy analytics focus.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources