volume_up
Increase the volume of an LG webOS TV by one step through an AI client.
Instructions
Increase the TV volume by one step.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Increase the volume of an LG webOS TV by one step through an AI client.
Increase the TV volume by one step.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the discrete step increase but does not mention behavior at volume boundaries (e.g., if already at maximum) or any side effects. For a simple tool, this is adequate but not thorough.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence with no filler. It is front-loaded and contains only essential information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, no output schema), the description is largely complete. It lacks explicit handling of edge cases (e.g., max volume) but provides the core action clearly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters; the schema coverage is effectively 100% (empty). The description does not add parameter details because none exist, which is appropriate. Baseline for zero parameters is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Increase the TV volume') and the unit ('by one step'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'volume_down' and 'set_volume' through its specific operation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies when to use (when a one-step volume increase is desired) but does not explicitly exclude alternatives or provide guidance on when not to use it (e.g., if setting a specific volume level is needed, use 'set_volume').
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/brunofgmag/lgtv-control-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server