No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 104 tools
Most tools target a distinct resource and action, and descriptions do a good job of cross-referencing siblings. However, there are several genuinely confusable pairs — invoke_heartbeat vs wakeup_agent, create_agent vs create_agent_hire vs create_approval, and update_agent vs set_agent_instructions_path — that an agent would need to study closely to disambiguate. At 104 tools, the cumulative surface creates real selection risk.
The paperclip_ prefix plus snake_case verb_noun naming is used consistently across nearly all tools, making the overall pattern highly predictable. Minor deviations exist, such as bare verbs like approve and reject (rather than approve_approval/reject_approval) and the semantically overlapping invoke_heartbeat vs wakeup_agent pair, but these are exceptions rather than the rule.
With 104 tools, this server far exceeds even a generous MCP surface and lands in the extreme-count category. While the domain is broad, agents would be overwhelmed by hundreds of choices, and many tools could be consolidated or split into separate domain-specific MCP servers.
The surface is remarkably broad, covering agents, companies, goals, projects, issues, approvals, routines, plugins, secrets, costs, feedback traces, and import/export flows. However, there are notable dead ends: paperclip_delete_routine and the plugin uninstall flow are referenced in descriptions but no such tools exist in the set, and several resources (labels, secrets, goals, projects) lack delete operations.