Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to IndeCX MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search public Citizen Space consultations and, with a Data API key, read activities, survey structures, responses, users, workspaces, and mailing lists from a Citizen Space site.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with LimeSurvey API to create and manage surveys, questions, question groups, activate surveys, and export responses through standardized MCP endpoints.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Build surveys, read responses and make reports in SurveyNinja from your AI assistant. Describe a survey in plain words, check it before launch and publish it, then read the responses, get a summary or an AI report and export the results to CSV, Excel, SPSS or PDF. Hosted server, sign in with OAuth or an API key; works on every plan, Free included.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to create and validate surveys, distribute them, read and tag responses, and generate reports or exports through a hosted Streamable HTTP MCP endpoint with API-key authentication.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to interact with Exact Synergy Enterprise and Exact Globe+ installations, discovering entities and public actions from the OData metadata and safely performing validated reads (with optional allowlisted mutations).
      8
      8 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an MCP client to discover ABS datasets, inspect SDMX dimension order and codelists, and run bounded statistical-data queries against the Australian Bureau of Statistics Data API.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools cover distinct resources—surveys, branches, blocklist, answers, invites, non-respondents, and categories—so the overall separation is clear. The main risk is list_actions vs get_action, since both relate to surveys and differ mainly by singular/plural and list/get; get_answers vs get_categories could also be confused but descriptions clarify raw vs categorized responses.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use the indecx_ prefix and a snake_case verb_noun pattern, which is consistent and predictable. The minor inconsistency is that collection retrieval mixes list_* (list_actions, list_branches) with get_* (get_answers, get_invites, get_categories), but this is not seriously misleading.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is a well-scoped size for a survey feedback MCP; each tool addresses a distinct data need without redundancy. This is comfortably within the ideal 3-15 tool range and no tool feels like filler.

    Completeness4/5

    For a read-only survey analytics server, the surface covers the main entities: surveys/questionnaires, branches, responses, invites, non-response, blocklists, and categories. Minor gaps exist, such as no single-response lookup or branch-filtered answers, but agents can work around these with the provided paginated collections.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues