Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to dotplot-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides product and web analytics capabilities, allowing AI coding assistants to query funnels, retention, trends, feature flags, A/B tests, and more in natural language.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Mixpanel product analytics that enables natural language querying of events, funnels, retention, cohorts, and user profiles, plus JQL support.
      33 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Agent-first analytics MCP server for querying stats, funnels, and web/agent traffic, with server-side event ingestion and self-serve signup.
      64 npm
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that provides AI assistants with powerful access to Pendo analytics through 15 specialized tools, transforming natural language questions into deep product insights.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for data analysis and visualization supporting CSV and Excel files. It enables users to generate statistical summaries and create multi-dimensional charts like heatmaps and bar plots through natural language.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      First-party web analytics MCP server for AI agents, providing 42 tools to query traffic, events, funnels, conversions, sources, and performance data.
      40
      34 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct, clearly-stated purpose, and the descriptions explicitly disambiguate the large overlap between the meta-tool analyze and its component tools (dot_plot, find_aha_moments, retention_curve, generate_report by naming analyze as 'START HERE' and the others as 'parts'. Boundaries are clear in text but the pipeline-vs-composite overlap still requires careful reading to avoid picking a component when the whole workflow is wanted.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names are uniformly snake_case, which is the key consistency factor. There is mild variation between verb_noun forms (get_report_strings, generate_report, classify_users, find_aha_moments) and noun phrases (dot_plot, retention_curve, onboarding_funnel), but the convention is predictable enough to navigate.

    Tool Count4/5

    16 tools is slightly on the heavy side but justified for a full product-analytics suite spanning ingest, analysis, benchmarking, publishing, and history. Nearly every tool earns its place, though some (compare_benchmark, submit_benchmark, find_similar_cases) are peripheral.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the lifecycle well: data ingestion (load_from_db, describe_events), the full analysis workflow (analyze plus components), external context (compare_benchmark, find_similar_cases, history_compare), and output (generate_report, publish_report). No obvious dead ends, though there is no raw-data export or report deletion tool.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues