dotplot-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to dotplot-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that provides product and web analytics capabilities, allowing AI coding assistants to query funnels, retention, trends, feature flags, A/B tests, and more in natural language.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Mixpanel product analytics that enables natural language querying of events, funnels, retention, cohorts, and user profiles, plus JQL support.33 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAgent-first analytics MCP server for querying stats, funnels, and web/agent traffic, with server-side event ingestion and self-serve signup.64 npm-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server that provides AI assistants with powerful access to Pendo analytics through 15 specialized tools, transforming natural language questions into deep product insights.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for data analysis and visualization supporting CSV and Excel files. It enables users to generate statistical summaries and create multi-dimensional charts like heatmaps and bar plots through natural language.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceFirst-party web analytics MCP server for AI agents, providing 42 tools to query traffic, events, funnels, conversions, sources, and performance data.4034 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Each tool has a distinct, clearly-stated purpose, and the descriptions explicitly disambiguate the large overlap between the meta-tool analyze and its component tools (dot_plot, find_aha_moments, retention_curve, generate_report by naming analyze as 'START HERE' and the others as 'parts'. Boundaries are clear in text but the pipeline-vs-composite overlap still requires careful reading to avoid picking a component when the whole workflow is wanted.
Names are uniformly snake_case, which is the key consistency factor. There is mild variation between verb_noun forms (get_report_strings, generate_report, classify_users, find_aha_moments) and noun phrases (dot_plot, retention_curve, onboarding_funnel), but the convention is predictable enough to navigate.
16 tools is slightly on the heavy side but justified for a full product-analytics suite spanning ingest, analysis, benchmarking, publishing, and history. Nearly every tool earns its place, though some (compare_benchmark, submit_benchmark, find_similar_cases) are peripheral.
The surface covers the lifecycle well: data ingestion (load_from_db, describe_events), the full analysis workflow (analyze plus components), external context (compare_benchmark, find_similar_cases, history_compare), and output (generate_report, publish_report). No obvious dead ends, though there is no raw-data export or report deletion tool.